What are Conde Nast up to? On the one hand Golf Digest puts Tiger on "indefinite leave" from his contractual writing obligations and on the other hand Vanity Fair plasters old Tiger Woods pictures on their February cover? The story that accompanies the Tiger piece is clearly written by someone who doesn't know golf and has factual errors as well as golf terminology errors which any sub ed should have picked up.
We all know that Magazine covers are designed to sell on the newsstand, but Vanity Fair (which I subscribe to) could and should do better than stoop to National Enquirer levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment